AFR vs Iceland: Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women
AFR
123
in 2019
Iceland
132
in 2019
AFR rank
10th
Iceland rank
9th
Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women over time
- AFR
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 132 against 123 in AFR, a difference of 9.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times AFR's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 10th and Iceland ranks 9th of 13 groups.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 121.2 | 133 | 11.8 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 122.9 | 132.9 | 10 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women, AFR or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 132 against 123 in AFR as of 2019.
- What is the difference in mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women between AFR and Iceland?
- 9, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do AFR and Iceland rank globally for mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women?
- AFR ranks 10th and Iceland ranks 9th of 13 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.