Jordan vs Latvia: Labor force, female, per unit of GDP
Jordan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Latvia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Jordan rank
124th
Latvia rank
125th
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP over time
- Jordan
- Latvia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Jordan ranks 124th and Latvia ranks 125th of 185 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per unit of gdp, Jordan or Latvia?
- Jordan, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per unit of gdp between Jordan and Latvia?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for labor force, female, per unit of gdp?
- Jordan ranks 124th and Latvia ranks 125th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.