IDA only vs South Sudan: Labor force, female, per unit of GDP
IDA only
0.0001 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Sudan
0.0002 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
IDA only rank
10th
South Sudan rank
10th
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP over time
- IDA only
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in IDA only, a difference of 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.9 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was IDA only ahead.
IDA only ranks 10th and South Sudan ranks 10th of 45 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, IDA only averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | IDA only |
| 2010s | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per unit of gdp, IDA only or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP in IDA only as of 2015.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per unit of gdp between IDA only and South Sudan?
- 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do IDA only and South Sudan rank globally for labor force, female, per unit of gdp?
- IDA only ranks 10th and South Sudan ranks 10th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.