Eritrea vs Malawi: Labor force, female, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0.0003 units per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Malawi
0.0003 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eritrea rank
5th
Malawi rank
6th
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Malawi
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.
Eritrea ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 6th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0009 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Malawi |
| 2010s | 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Malawi?
- Eritrea, at 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP against 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Malawi?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Malawi?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Malawi rank globally for labor force, female, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 6th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.