Canada vs Malta: Labor force, female, per unit of GDP
Canada
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Malta
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Canada rank
157th
Malta rank
156th
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP over time
- Canada
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Canada, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.
Canada ranks 157th and Malta ranks 156th of 185 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per unit of gdp, Canada or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Canada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per unit of gdp between Canada and Malta?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Malta?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Canada and Malta rank globally for labor force, female, per unit of gdp?
- Canada ranks 157th and Malta ranks 156th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.