Australia vs Macao: Labor force, female, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Macao
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Australia rank
166th
Macao rank
169th
Labor force, female, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Macao
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Macao, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Macao ahead.
Australia ranks 166th and Macao ranks 169th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Macao |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Macao |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per unit of gdp, Australia or Macao?
- Australia, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Macao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per unit of gdp between Australia and Macao?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Macao?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Macao rank globally for labor force, female, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 166th and Macao ranks 169th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.