Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre

Low & middle income
14.63 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
106.64 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
11th
Rwanda rank
13th

Labor force, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Rwanda
020406080100199020062023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 106.64 units per square kilometre against 14.63 units per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 92.01 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 7.3 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 10.02 units per square kilometre 41.11 units per square kilometre 31.09 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 11.94 units per square kilometre 59.17 units per square kilometre 47.23 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 13.13 units per square kilometre 78.25 units per square kilometre 65.12 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 14.13 units per square kilometre 97.8 units per square kilometre 83.68 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labor force, female, per square kilometre, Low & middle income or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 106.64 units per square kilometre against 14.63 units per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in labor force, female, per square kilometre between Low & middle income and Rwanda?
92.01 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Rwanda?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Rwanda rank globally for labor force, female, per square kilometre?
Low & middle income ranks 11th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/rwanda/">Low & middle income vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Labor force, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
234 places, 7,804 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Labor force, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.