What is the difference in labor force, female, per square kilometre between IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?

94.28 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre

IDA & IBRD total

12.36 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

106.64 units per square kilometre

in 2023

IDA & IBRD total rank

15th

Rwanda rank

13th

Labor force, female, per square kilometre over time

IDA & IBRD total
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 106.64 units per square kilometre against 12.36 units per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 94.28 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 8.6 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IDA & IBRD total	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	8.92 units per square kilometre	41.11 units per square kilometre	32.19 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	10.12 units per square kilometre	59.17 units per square kilometre	49.05 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	11.14 units per square kilometre	78.25 units per square kilometre	67.11 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	11.95 units per square kilometre	97.8 units per square kilometre	85.86 units per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labor force, female, per square kilometre, IDA & IBRD total or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 106.64 units per square kilometre against 12.36 units per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in labor force, female, per square kilometre between IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?: 94.28 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Rwanda rank globally for labor force, female, per square kilometre?: IDA & IBRD total ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/rwanda/">IDA & IBRD total vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Labor force, female, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 234 places, 7,804 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

Labor force, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.