What is the difference in labor force, female, per square kilometre between IBRD only and Rwanda?

94.05 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Rwanda?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

IBRD only vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre

IBRD only

12.59 units per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

106.64 units per square kilometre

in 2023

IBRD only rank

13th

Rwanda rank

13th

Labor force, female, per square kilometre over time

IBRD only
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 106.64 units per square kilometre against 12.59 units per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 94.05 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 8.5 times IBRD only's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IBRD only	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	9.83 units per square kilometre	41.11 units per square kilometre	31.27 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2000s	10.73 units per square kilometre	59.17 units per square kilometre	48.44 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2010s	11.62 units per square kilometre	78.25 units per square kilometre	66.63 units per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	12.2 units per square kilometre	97.8 units per square kilometre	85.6 units per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher labor force, female, per square kilometre, IBRD only or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 106.64 units per square kilometre against 12.59 units per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in labor force, female, per square kilometre between IBRD only and Rwanda?: 94.05 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Rwanda?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Rwanda rank globally for labor force, female, per square kilometre?: IBRD only ranks 13th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/labor-force-female-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/rwanda/">IBRD only vs Rwanda: Labor force, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Labor force, female, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 234 places, 7,804 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

Labor force, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.