Latvia vs Madagascar: Labor force, female, per capita
Latvia
0.2556 units per person
in 2025
Madagascar
0.254 units per person
in 2025
Latvia rank
29th
Madagascar rank
31st
Labor force, female, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.2556 units per person against 0.254 units per person in Madagascar, a difference of 0.0016 units per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 29th and Madagascar ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2301 units per person | 0.2289 units per person | 0.0011 units per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.2402 units per person | 0.2315 units per person | 0.0087 units per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.2541 units per person | 0.2414 units per person | 0.0127 units per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.2547 units per person | 0.2503 units per person | 0.0044 units per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per capita, Latvia or Madagascar?
- Latvia, at 0.2556 units per person against 0.254 units per person in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per capita between Latvia and Madagascar?
- 0.0016 units per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Madagascar?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Madagascar rank globally for labor force, female, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 29th and Madagascar ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.