Jamaica vs Thailand: Labor force, female, per capita
Jamaica
0.2621 units per person
in 2025
Thailand
0.2616 units per person
in 2025
Jamaica rank
15th
Thailand rank
16th
Labor force, female, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Thailand
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.2621 units per person against 0.2616 units per person in Thailand, a difference of 0.0005 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Thailand ahead.
Jamaica ranks 15th and Thailand ranks 16th of 186 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2065 units per person | 0.2436 units per person | 0.0371 units per person | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0.1989 units per person | 0.2577 units per person | 0.0588 units per person | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.2167 units per person | 0.2585 units per person | 0.0418 units per person | Thailand |
| 2020s | 0.25 units per person | 0.2604 units per person | 0.0104 units per person | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per capita, Jamaica or Thailand?
- Jamaica, at 0.2621 units per person against 0.2616 units per person in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per capita between Jamaica and Thailand?
- 0.0005 units per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Thailand?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and Thailand rank globally for labor force, female, per capita?
- Jamaica ranks 15th and Thailand ranks 16th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.