Eswatini vs Zambia: Labor force, female, per capita
Eswatini
0.1673 units per person
in 2025
Zambia
0.1693 units per person
in 2025
Eswatini rank
132nd
Zambia rank
129th
Labor force, female, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.1693 units per person against 0.1673 units per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.002 units per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 129th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1232 units per person | 0.1399 units per person | 0.0167 units per person | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0.1414 units per person | 0.141 units per person | 0.0005 units per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.1539 units per person | 0.1448 units per person | 0.0091 units per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.1623 units per person | 0.1626 units per person | 0.0003 units per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per capita, Eswatini or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.1693 units per person against 0.1673 units per person in Eswatini as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per capita between Eswatini and Zambia?
- 0.002 units per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zambia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Zambia rank globally for labor force, female, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 132nd and Zambia ranks 129th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.