Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Labor force, female, per capita
Ecuador
0.2014 units per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.2007 units per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
97th
Labor force, female, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.2014 units per person against 0.2007 units per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0007 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ecuador ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1527 units per person | 0.1745 units per person | 0.0217 units per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.1682 units per person | 0.1928 units per person | 0.0246 units per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.183 units per person | 0.1878 units per person | 0.0049 units per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1974 units per person | 0.1942 units per person | 0.0032 units per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per capita, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Ecuador, at 0.2014 units per person against 0.2007 units per person in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per capita between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0007 units per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor force, female, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.