Congo vs Zimbabwe: Labor force, female, per capita
Congo
0.1982 units per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.2007 units per person
in 2025
Congo rank
99th
Zimbabwe rank
97th
Labor force, female, per capita over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2007 units per person against 0.1982 units per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0025 units per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1896 units per person | 0.1745 units per person | 0.0152 units per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0.1975 units per person | 0.1928 units per person | 0.0047 units per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.196 units per person | 0.1878 units per person | 0.0082 units per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.193 units per person | 0.1942 units per person | 0.0013 units per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force, female, per capita, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.2007 units per person against 0.1982 units per person in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in labor force, female, per capita between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0025 units per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for labor force, female, per capita?
- Congo ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.