Qatar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates)
Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Qatar
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 16.34 against 13.34 in Qatar, a difference of 3.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Qatar ahead.
Qatar ranks 188th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 185th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.56 | 13.47 | 3.09 | Qatar |
| 2000s | 16.18 | 12.7 | 3.47 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 13.05 | 15.49 | 2.44 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | 12.96 | 16.39 | 3.42 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates), Qatar or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 16.34 against 13.34 in Qatar as of 2027.
- What is the difference in inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Qatar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 3, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2027.
- How do Qatar and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Qatar ranks 188th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 185th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator conveys the number of persons of working age outside the labour force (that is, not employed or unemployed) expressed as a percentage of the working-age population. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.