Congo vs Oman: Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates)
Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Congo
- Oman
How they compare
Congo currently reports 32.22 against 31.76 in Oman, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Oman ahead.
Congo ranks 152nd and Oman ranks 154th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.49 | 42.43 | 10.94 | Oman |
| 2000s | 32.04 | 43.32 | 11.28 | Oman |
| 2010s | 31.99 | 32.43 | 0.4386 | Oman |
| 2020s | 32.8 | 32.3 | 0.5009 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates), Congo or Oman?
- Congo, at 32.22 against 31.76 in Oman as of 2027.
- What is the difference in inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Congo and Oman?
- 0.46, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Oman?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2027.
- How do Congo and Oman rank globally for inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Congo ranks 152nd and Oman ranks 154th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator conveys the number of persons of working age outside the labour force (that is, not employed or unemployed) expressed as a percentage of the working-age population. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.