Asia and the Pacific: High income vs Uzbekistan: Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates)
Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Asia and the Pacific: High income
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 42.99 against 36.42 in Asia and the Pacific: High income, a difference of 6.57.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Asia and the Pacific: High income's.
Across all 38 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 64th and Uzbekistan ranks 63rd of 87 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Asia and the Pacific: High income | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.5 | 42.69 | 5.2 | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 38.91 | 44.17 | 5.25 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 38.87 | 43.9 | 5.03 | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 36.79 | 42.94 | 6.16 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates), Asia and the Pacific: High income or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 42.99 against 36.42 in Asia and the Pacific: High income as of 2027.
- What is the difference in inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Asia and the Pacific: High income and Uzbekistan?
- 6.57, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Asia and the Pacific: High income and Uzbekistan?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2027.
- How do Asia and the Pacific: High income and Uzbekistan rank globally for inactivity rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Asia and the Pacific: High income ranks 64th and Uzbekistan ranks 63rd of 87 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Inactivity rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. This indicator conveys the number of persons of working age outside the labour force (that is, not employed or unemployed) expressed as a percentage of the working-age population. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.