New Zealand vs Peru: Female share of low pay earners
Female share of low pay earners over time
- New Zealand
- Peru
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 56.3 against 55.96 in Peru, a difference of 0.34.
Across all 14 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 13th and Peru ranks 14th of 70 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.35 | 43.06 | 13.29 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 57.56 | 44.76 | 12.8 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 54.95 | 50 | 4.95 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female share of low pay earners, New Zealand or Peru?
- New Zealand, at 56.3 against 55.96 in Peru as of 2011.
- What is the difference in female share of low pay earners between New Zealand and Peru?
- 0.34, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Peru?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2011.
- How do New Zealand and Peru rank globally for female share of low pay earners?
- New Zealand ranks 13th and Peru ranks 14th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Female share of low pay earners. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This measure of earnings dispersion refers to the percentage of low pay workers, among all low pay workers, who are female. For more information, refer to the Gender Equality and Non-Discrimination Indicators (GEND) database description.