Israel vs New Zealand: Female share of low pay earners
Female share of low pay earners over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
Israel currently reports 56.33 against 56.3 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 12th and New Zealand ranks 13th of 70 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.45 | 56.35 | 11.1 | Israel |
| 2000s | 67.13 | 57.56 | 9.57 | Israel |
| 2010s | 53.8 | 54.95 | 1.15 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female share of low pay earners, Israel or New Zealand?
- Israel, at 56.33 against 56.3 in New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in female share of low pay earners between Israel and New Zealand?
- 0.03, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2011.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for female share of low pay earners?
- Israel ranks 12th and New Zealand ranks 13th of 70 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Female share of low pay earners. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This measure of earnings dispersion refers to the percentage of low pay workers, among all low pay workers, who are female. For more information, refer to the Gender Equality and Non-Discrimination Indicators (GEND) database description.