Gibraltar vs Rwanda: Female migrants
Gibraltar
49.5%
in 2020
Rwanda
49.4%
in 2020
Gibraltar rank
100th
Rwanda rank
101st
Female migrants over time
- Gibraltar
- Rwanda
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 49.5% against 49.4% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 100th and Rwanda ranks 101st of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.0% | 49.3% | 0.4% | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 51.5% | 49.5% | 2.0% | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 49.8% | 50.0% | 0.2% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 49.5% | 49.4% | 0.0% | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female migrants, Gibraltar or Rwanda?
- Gibraltar, at 49.5% against 49.4% in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in female migrants between Gibraltar and Rwanda?
- 0.1%, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Rwanda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Gibraltar and Rwanda rank globally for female migrants?
- Gibraltar ranks 100th and Rwanda ranks 101st of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, Trends in International Migrant Stock: 2020 Revision. Data downloaded as of December 6, 2024, published as Female migrants (% of international migrant stock). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of female migrants out of total international migrant stock. International migrant stock is the number of people born in a country other than that in which they live. It also includes refugees.