Congo vs Iceland: Female migrants
Congo
45.5%
in 2020
Iceland
45.4%
in 2020
Congo rank
157th
Iceland rank
158th
Female migrants over time
- Congo
- Iceland
How they compare
Congo currently reports 45.5% against 45.4% in Iceland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.
Congo ranks 157th and Iceland ranks 158th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.1% | 55.4% | 5.2% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 47.8% | 53.0% | 5.2% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 45.4% | 50.5% | 5.1% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 45.5% | 45.4% | 0.1% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female migrants, Congo or Iceland?
- Congo, at 45.5% against 45.4% in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in female migrants between Congo and Iceland?
- 0.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Iceland rank globally for female migrants?
- Congo ranks 157th and Iceland ranks 158th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, Trends in International Migrant Stock: 2020 Revision. Data downloaded as of December 6, 2024, published as Female migrants (% of international migrant stock). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of female migrants out of total international migrant stock. International migrant stock is the number of people born in a country other than that in which they live. It also includes refugees.