Aruba vs Grenada: Female migrants
Aruba
54.6%
in 2020
Grenada
54.4%
in 2020
Aruba rank
19th
Grenada rank
22nd
Female migrants over time
- Aruba
- Grenada
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 54.6% against 54.4% in Grenada, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 19th and Grenada ranks 22nd of 211 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55.4% | 50.5% | 4.8% | Aruba |
| 2000s | 55.2% | 50.4% | 4.8% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 55.4% | 50.4% | 5.0% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 54.6% | 54.4% | 0.3% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher female migrants, Aruba or Grenada?
- Aruba, at 54.6% against 54.4% in Grenada as of 2020.
- What is the difference in female migrants between Aruba and Grenada?
- 0.2%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Grenada?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Aruba and Grenada rank globally for female migrants?
- Aruba ranks 19th and Grenada ranks 22nd of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, Trends in International Migrant Stock: 2020 Revision. Data downloaded as of December 6, 2024, published as Female migrants (% of international migrant stock). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of female migrants out of total international migrant stock. International migrant stock is the number of people born in a country other than that in which they live. It also includes refugees.