Israel vs New Zealand: Average effective age of retirement for women
Israel
66 years
in 2018
New Zealand
66.4 years
in 2018
Israel rank
9th
New Zealand rank
8th
Average effective age of retirement for women over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 66.4 years against 66 years in Israel, a difference of 0.4 years.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.37 years | 60.79 years | 3.58 years | Israel |
| 2000s | 63.15 years | 62.81 years | 0.34 years | Israel |
| 2010s | 65.67 years | 66.38 years | 0.7111 years | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average effective age of retirement for women, Israel or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 66.4 years against 66 years in Israel as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average effective age of retirement for women between Israel and New Zealand?
- 0.4 years, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for average effective age of retirement for women?
- Israel ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- OECD (2018) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average effective age of retirement for women. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimates are based on a weighted average of changes in labour force participation rates by age, for workers 40+