Israel vs New Zealand: Average effective retirement women
Israel
66
in 2018
New Zealand
66.4
in 2018
Israel rank
9th
New Zealand rank
8th
Average effective retirement women over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 66.4 against 66 in Israel, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.37 | 60.79 | 3.58 | Israel |
| 2000s | 63.15 | 62.81 | 0.34 | Israel |
| 2010s | 65.67 | 66.38 | 0.7111 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average effective retirement women, Israel or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 66.4 against 66 in Israel as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average effective retirement women between Israel and New Zealand?
- 0.4, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for average effective retirement women?
- Israel ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average effective retirement women. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.