Chile vs New Zealand: Average effective retirement women
Chile
66.7
in 2018
New Zealand
66.4
in 2018
Chile rank
5th
New Zealand rank
8th
Average effective retirement women over time
- Chile
- New Zealand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 66.7 against 66.4 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.
Chile ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 49 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 68.16 | 66.78 | 1.38 | Chile |
| 1980s | 66.68 | 62.59 | 4.09 | Chile |
| 1990s | 65.88 | 60.79 | 5.09 | Chile |
| 2000s | 66.93 | 62.81 | 4.12 | Chile |
| 2010s | 67.66 | 66.38 | 1.28 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average effective retirement women, Chile or New Zealand?
- Chile, at 66.7 against 66.4 in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average effective retirement women between Chile and New Zealand?
- 0.3, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2018.
- How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for average effective retirement women?
- Chile ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average effective retirement women. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.