Australia vs Latvia: Average effective retirement women
Australia
64.3
in 2018
Latvia
64.7
in 2018
Australia rank
17th
Latvia rank
16th
Average effective retirement women over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 64.7 against 64.3 in Australia, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Latvia ahead.
Australia ranks 17th and Latvia ranks 16th of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 59.18 | 59.3 | 0.1167 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 61.09 | 61.07 | 0.02 | Australia |
| 2010s | 63.22 | 63.1 | 0.1222 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average effective retirement women, Australia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 64.7 against 64.3 in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average effective retirement women between Australia and Latvia?
- 0.4, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for average effective retirement women?
- Australia ranks 17th and Latvia ranks 16th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average effective retirement women. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.