Laos vs Zimbabwe: Anemia: share of pregnant women vs. share of children
Laos
30.0%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
30.1%
in 2023
Laos rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
79th
Anemia: share of pregnant women vs. share of children over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 30.1% against 30.0% in Laos, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Laos ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 192 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.5% | 34.1% | 7.4% | Laos |
| 2010s | 34.4% | 30.7% | 3.7% | Laos |
| 2020s | 30.6% | 29.9% | 0.6% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher anemia: share of pregnant women vs. share of children, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 30.1% against 30.0% in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in anemia: share of pregnant women vs. share of children between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for anemia: share of pregnant women vs. share of children?
- Laos ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Health Observatory / World Health Statistics - World Health Organization (WHO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Anemia: share of pregnant women vs. share of children. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of pregnant women with anemia vs the share of children aged between six months and five years who have anemia. Anemia is a condition that develops when your blood lacks enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin.