China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Jordan: Adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
1.03
in 2022
Jordan
1.26
in 2022
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
1st
Jordan rank
1st

Adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Jordan
00.511.5200020112022

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1.26 against 1.03 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 0.23.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Jordan ahead.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 1st of 2 groups.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.987 0.9879 0.0009 Jordan
2010s 1.02 1.11 0.0922 Jordan
2020s 1.03 1.26 0.2255 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Jordan?
Jordan, at 1.26 against 1.03 in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2022.
What is the difference in adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Jordan?
0.23, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Jordan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Jordan rank globally for adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (ratio). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Jordan: Adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-gender-parity-index-for-achieving-a-minimum-proficiency-level-in-reading-and/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://gender.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-gender-parity-index-for-achieving-a-minimum-proficiency-level-in-reading-and/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/jordan/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Jordan: Adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted gender parity index for achieving a minimum proficiency level in reading and mathematics (ratio)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
59 places, 412 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed